refactor tests based on the comments of auth test pr #90
Conversation
|
Based on your review schedule, I'll hold off on reviewing this PR until it's marked as ready for review. If you'd like me to take a look now, comment
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Google OAuth fixture for test data centralization, update test setups to use fixtures instead of hardcoded values, and remove several redundant or unnecessary test cases across authentication-related unit tests. Some tests are also updated to use Django's reverse URL resolution for improved maintainability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestCase
participant Fixtures
participant GoogleOAuthService
participant UserRepository
TestCase->>Fixtures: Import GOOGLE_OAUTH_FIXTURE, users_db_data
TestCase->>GoogleOAuthService: Initialize with fixture data
TestCase->>UserRepository: Initialize with fixture user data
GoogleOAuthService-->>TestCase: Run authentication logic using fixture
UserRepository-->>TestCase: Run repository logic using fixture
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changesNo out-of-scope changes found. Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
todo/tests/fixtures/google_oauth.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/unit/models/test_user.py(0 hunks)todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/unit/services/test_google_oauth_service.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- todo/tests/unit/models/test_user.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
todo/tests/unit/services/test_google_oauth_service.py
[convention] 12-12: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
todo/tests/fixtures/google_oauth.py
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py
[error] 7-7: Unable to import 'django.urls'
(E0401)
[convention] 7-7: Imports from package django are not grouped
(C0412)
todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py
[convention] 13-13: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
todo/tests/unit/services/test_google_oauth_service.py (2)
8-9: Excellent use of centralized fixtures.The transition from hardcoded test data to centralized fixtures improves maintainability and consistency across the test suite.
14-20: Verify that removed test coverage is maintained elsewhere.The setup correctly uses the new fixtures. However, according to the AI summary, the
test_get_user_info_missing_fieldstest method was removed from this file. This test was validating error handling when required fields are missing from Google's user info response.#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for test coverage of missing fields validation in user info # Expected: Find alternative test coverage for missing required fields (email, name) validation # Search for tests that validate missing email/name fields in Google user info rg -A 10 -B 5 "missing.*field|required.*field" --type py todo/tests/ echo "---" # Search for tests that handle GoogleAPIException for user info rg -A 10 -B 5 "GoogleAPIException.*user.*info|user.*info.*GoogleAPIException" --type py todo/tests/todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py (2)
14-15: Good refactoring to use fixture data.The transition to fixture-based test data with appropriate field mapping (email_id → email) maintains consistency across the test suite.
69-75: Improved dynamic test case generation.The refactored approach dynamically generates test cases from fixture data rather than using hardcoded values. This ensures tests remain synchronized with the fixture data structure.
todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py (2)
7-7: Excellent adoption of Django's reverse URL resolution.Using
reverse()instead of hardcoded URL strings is a Django best practice that makes tests more maintainable when URL patterns change.
18-18: To properly verify the existence of those URL names, let’s rerun with corrected quoting and targeted searches:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that URL names "tasks" and "google_login" exist in URL configuration # 1. Search all Python files for explicit name= definitions rg "name=['\"]tasks['\"]" --type py rg "name=['\"]google_login['\"]" --type py # 2. Narrow down to files named urls.py and look for either name fd -e py -t f | grep -E 'urls\.py$' | xargs -r rg -H "name=['\"]tasks['\"]|name=['\"]google_login['\"]"todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py (3)
15-16: Consistent fixture usage maintained.The setup correctly adopts the centralized fixture approach with appropriate field mapping.
52-59: Enhanced timestamp validation is beneficial.The additional assertions for MongoDB update operations with
$setand$setOnInsertensure proper timestamp handling during user creation and updates.
8-8: ```shell
#!/bin/bashDisplay the full
test_create_or_update_no_resultto verify error handling assertionsrg -n -A 10 -B 5 "def test_create_or_update_no_result" --type py todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py
</details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@VaibhavSingh8 we need more test cases, There are many files that needs more coverage
Sure sir, I will create a new tcr and do it separately. This pr aims to refactor the tests based on the previous pr comments. |
Date: 21-Jun-2025
Developer Name: @VaibhavSingh8
Issue Ticket Number
Description
This PR aims to remove/refactor tests, suggested by Yash in the previous PR for the auth tests PR #83
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Refactor existing tests by integrating constant URLs using Django's
reversefunction, modifying user data handling to use fixtures for consistency, and removing redundant or overlapping test cases across various files.Why are these changes being made?
These changes improve test maintainability and consistency by reusing defined data structures and constants, as suggested in previous code review comments for the authentication test PR. This approach reduces duplication, enhances clarity, and ensures that tests are robust against changes in data structures and configurations.